similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to spookyauthor.com

Spooky Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

caitlinupshall.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

garyjaypool.com

Gary Jay Pool | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna Qu: Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Bazzel Baz Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cakewithnonna.com

Carmela Bruno | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anniequinnwrites.com

Annie Quinn | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

D. L. Diehl, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anngrayauthor.com

Home | Ann Gray Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

shelleybuckauthor.com

Shelley Buck Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anneremmelauthor.com

Anne Remmel Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

camkingsley.com

Cam Kingsley | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

modernauthorguide.com

The Modern Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rick-burnett.com

Rick Burnett | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

richardneer.com

Richard Neer | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧

Carolyn Ellis | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dizeronance.com

Neel Mullick Author | books

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Shelly Oria | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.