Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to splitboxy.com

Piotr Brzozowski | Developer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
amcalledglitchy.dev
glitchy - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
kturker.com
Kerem Turker | Kotlin Developer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
benji377.dev
benji377 (Benjamin Demetz) - Full-Stack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexperry.dev
Alex Perry | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
bengreenberg.org
Ben Greenberg | Developer Advocate
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
bengreenberg.dev
Ben Greenberg | Developer Advocate
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
robertsdevtalk.com
Join our Developer Journey!
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
themoderndeveloper.com
The Modern Developer |
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alecotterson.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
akhilanand.tech
Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
matthewgh.com
Matt's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
farahabdi.com
Farah's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kscubestore.com
Sarik's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
insiya-raja.com
Insiya's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
pranavbhartiya.com
Pranav's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ariiq.com
Ariiq — Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
maxshi.com
Max Shi - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.