similar sites

‹ profile Tools

Sites similar to spaketti.dev

🍝 · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

MAILabOrg · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Supertier · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

itsbonczek · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

OdeSQo (odesqo) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

commuterdesign.com

jdewyea (Justin Dewyea) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

shneziri (Shkelzen Neziri) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

eugenloncaric.com

eugenloncaric (Eugen Loncaric) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

conradweberling.com

conradweberling (Conrad Weberling) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

magecustomfields.com

Mage Custom Fields · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

apisq · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

anyfld · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

dintho · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thexman · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Hillpro · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Madhour · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

MoeFlow · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.