Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to spacetimedata.de

Test App · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
progressio-partner.de 🇩🇪
FK-Feedback
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
sd-tour.de 🇩🇪
Tour-APP
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
opentestframework.de 🇩🇪
Open Test Framework
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
palmbooks.de 🇩🇪
PHP-Test
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
smartcookiecontrol.com
Cookietest
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
rs-apps.de 🇩🇪
RidaSmart Apps - Webseite in Arbeit
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
software-testserver.com
Software-Testserver
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
petergasser.com
Web- und App Entwicklung
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
sebastian-dernbach.de 🇩🇪
Sebastian Dernbach - Web & App Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
olzhausen.de 🇩🇪
Philip Olzhausen | Freelance Dev: Web & Apps, AI
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
prog42.de 🇩🇪
www.prog42.de - Testbetrieb
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
thetechxde.com
TechXDE | Web & App Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
rosefeld.de 🇩🇪
Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
schumacher-it-services.de 🇩🇪
Sample "Hello, World" Application
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
disol.io
digitLabs – Web & Agentic Services
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
dksoftwarestudio.com
DK Software Studio | Websites & Apps aus Hof
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
sparkeestudios.com
Sparkee Studios | Website & App-Entwicklung für KMUs
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
spies-digital-solutions.com
Sebastian Spies | App-Entwicklung & UX
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.