Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to sonangga.dev

Angga Maulana | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
calculated-code.com
calculatedCode | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
obarsal.dev
Rubar Ozan Barsal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
lwebb.dev
Logan Webb | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
antipotion.com
Antipotion | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
gedasga.com
GedasGa | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
evanking.dev
Evan King | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sharmayash.com
Yash Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
connortabora.com
Connor Tabora | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
hellotoms.com
Hellotoms.com | Tom's Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
connorburri.com
Connor Burri | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
antaresjeet.com
Ranjit | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
shaunasaunders.com
Shauna Saunders - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
dmajeed.com
Daniyal Majeed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ethancervera.com
Ethan Cervera | Jr Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.