Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to soltaze.com

SOLTAZE - Publishing research that makes an impact · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
dlpublications.com
Research Hub - Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
arpubi.com
African Research Publishing Institute
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
arpgweb.com
Academic Research Publishing Group - ARPG
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
boldwoodbooks.com
Boldwood - Publishing Reimagined
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
theroadallegory.com
Finger Lakes Publishing |
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
rjsaonline.com
Research Journals Online – Publishing Platform
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
bluegempublishing.com
Blue Gem Publishing |
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
thepublishinggeniie.com
The Publishing Geniie
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
blueberg.ai
Blueberg Paper - The Publishing Concierge for Researchers
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
blueseapublishing.com
Bluesea Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
sohopublishing.com
SoHo Publishing LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
acp-testing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
acpublishing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
aipublishing.ai
AI Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
acrpublishing.com
ACR Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
a2npublishing.com
A2N Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
bhepublishing.com
BHE Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
thepublishinggenies.com
The Publishing Genies
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.