Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to solid-apps.com

Home - Solid Apps GmbH · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
solid-qualitysolutions.com
Home - Solid Quality Solutions
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
solidqualitysolutions.com
Home - Solid Quality Solutions
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
solomonbwire.com
Home - Solomon Bwire
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
matlab-apps.com
Home - MATLAB Apps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
softogon.com
Home - softogon.com
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softmondo.com
Home - Softmondo.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
softwaregaze.com
Home - Software Gaze
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
softwareframe.com
Home - SoftwareFrame
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
softwarearray.com
Home - Software Array
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softapkguru.com
Home - softapkguru.com
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softwaremagnet.com
Home - Software Magnet
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softwisehub.com
Home - softwisehub.com
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
a6k.dev
HOME - A6k
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
softwareunboxed.com
Home - Software Unboxed
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softwarestrider.com
Home - Software Strider
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softwarekeystech.com
Home - softwarekeystech
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softwareclinics.com
Home - Software Clinincs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
softwareplaza.com
SWP Home - SoftwarePlaza
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.