Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softwaretherapist.com

Software Therapist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
softwarethis.com
Software This!
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
max-heller.com
Max Heller | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
mcalsoftware.com
MCAL Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
softwarevoice.com
Software Voice
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwaretospec.com
Software to Spec
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwareunited.com
Software United
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
bodyworkbuddy.com
Massage Software for Massage Therapists : Bodywork Buddy
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwarepalace.org
Software Palace
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
software-city.org
Software City
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwareaus.com
Softwareaus
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
bigtrendmobil.com
BIG Trendmobil | Software Engineering
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwarethoughts.com
Software Thoughts
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
therapistos.com
Therapist OS
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
mcraepetrey.com
McRae Petrey | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
bttsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
BTT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
jdrsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
JDR Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwaretroop.com
Software Troop
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.