Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softwaresing.dev

SoftwareSing (soft) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
softwareblair.dev
SoftwareBlair · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
faqeel.dev
faqeel (Fares) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
pinat.dev
aPinat (aPinat) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
softwarecopilot.com
jmsiefer (Software CoPilot) / Repositories · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
81match
aaix.dev
aaix (aidan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
inueni.com
Inueni · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
81match
rokit.dev
trey-k · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
ipost.dev
ipost (Isaac Post) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
a-jd.dev
a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
1lt.dev
1LtFord · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
aericio.net
Aericio · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
alecv.tech
alecvdp (Alec) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
a9ski.com
thexman · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
dombean.com
dombean · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
dockerimagefinder.com
Flamiing (Amir) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
grisenti.dev
grisenti · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
kylemichaelfox.com
kfox112 (Kyle) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
bignext.ai
bigmusic (BiG) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.