similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to softwareengineer.lk

TERMINAL_ACCESS || AUTH_v4 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

3xMB • Terminal

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

accessvector.net

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

accessmyinfo.org

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

accesscontrols.net

Access Controls

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Access restricted

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

armanthecyber.com

Arman The Cyber | Terminal

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Imaging | Access | Systems

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

365andawakeup.com

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

3dbroadcastingnetwork.com

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

3dtourscanada.com

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

3dtourseurope.com

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

3dtraveleurope.com

Unauthorized Access

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.