similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to softwarecopilot.com

jmsiefer (Software CoPilot) / Repositories · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

roblatour (Rob Latour) / Repositories · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

softwaresing.dev

SoftwareSing (soft) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

softwareblair.dev

SoftwareBlair · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aaix (aidan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

kyonifer (Kyle Kauffman) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Mes-ser (Messer) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

laralabs.uk 🇬🇧

Laralabs · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Inueni · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

Neverwoods · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

trey-k · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1LtFord · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Aericio · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

divotmaker · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

eBellmer (Ethan Bellmer) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thexman · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dombean · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

grisenti · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

quotentiroler (max) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.