Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to software.whoswho

Whois – software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
erp2.uk 🇬🇧
ERP Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
jdrsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
JDR Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
solidsoftware.tech
Solid Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
distilled-software.com
Home – Distilled Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
kylerobson.com
Kyle Robson – Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
rni-soft.com
RNI Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
bttsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
BTT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
ahrsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
AHR Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
ditechsoftware.com
Gopher Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
mcalsoftware.com
MCAL Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
citius-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Citius Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
pq-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
P&Q – Software Consultancy and Development
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
scarabsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
P&Q – Software Consultancy and Development
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
inxeria.com
Inxeria Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
pilotltd.com
Pilot Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
aumsoftware.co.in 🇮🇳
Aum Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
coadsoftware.com
Coad Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
newdeal-software.com
NEW DEAL SOFTWARE
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.