Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to software-sellemond.com

Fabian Sellemond | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
nezih.dev
Nezih | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abubakar-noorulhassan.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
guerrajavierswe.com
Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
dmajeed.com
Daniyal Majeed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
matiasrotondo.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ronaldsequeira.com
Ronald Flores | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
faridraka.dev
Farid Raka | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
farisantoni.com
Faris Danish | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
sonangga.dev
Angga Maulana | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
boamorte.dev
Esteban Salazar | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ronydev.com
Rony Silva | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
sohammayekar.com
Soham Mayekar | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
mashoado.com
Masho Ado | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
alexdunne.net
Alex Dunne | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.