Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to software-kinetics.co.uk

Software Kinetics · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
mattkeenan.dev
Matt - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nicorithner.com
Nico Rithner software development
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
nicholasmajeski.com
NM | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
phyozinwai.com
Phyo Zin Wai - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
arunyadhav.dev
Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
arjuntp.com
Arjun TP - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mbhsiddiqui.com
Maaz Siddiqui | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mchafizdev.com
Muhammad Chaerul Hafiz — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andrewshamah.com
Amichai Shamah
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
nicolaas.dev
NicmeisteR | Lead Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
ankush-thakur.com
Portfolio | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
bokorarmin.com
Bokor Ármin - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewjohnson.dev
Resume - Andrew A. Johnson - Lead Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrienpecson.dev
Andrien B. Pecson – Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
gsheerey.com
Gurkirt Heerey — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
robindykema.com
Robin Dykema — Staff Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
abrahamgr.dev
Abraham Galindo | Staff Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kunaldandona.com
Kunal Dandona — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.