Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to software-estimation.org

Software Estimation · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
omegasoftwares.in 🇮🇳
Omega Software Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
swsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
SW Software Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
softwaresessions.com
Software Sessions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
ilmsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
ILM Software LTD
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
coadsoftware.com
Coad Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
softwarealgo.com
Software Algo Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
bluepondsoftware.com
Blue Pond Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
softwareespresso.com
CMD Software Espresso
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
aumsoftware.co.in 🇮🇳
Aum Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
clusterfig.com
Cluster Fig Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
softwarevantage.com
Software Vantage
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwareultimate.com
SoftwareUltimate SAS
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
enzymesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home | Enzyme Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
fbbsoftwareexperts.com
FBB Software Experts
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softwarepalace.org
Software Palace
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
alces.net
ALCES - Software development
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
codeiam.com
Expert Software Development | CodeIAM
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
softwareaus.com
Softwareaus
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.