Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softrex-consulting.com

SOFTREX CONSULTING · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
mbconsultinghealth.com
MB Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
78match
intelial.com
McKay Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
78match
lbconsulting.uk 🇬🇧
LB Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
76match
seb-consulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
SEB Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
76match
mdsconsulting.com
Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
76match
medicalbusinesscorp.com
Medical Business Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
76match
medevolveconsulting.com
Med Evolve Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
75match
cmkconsult.com
CMK Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
75match
mcjconsulting.com
MCJ Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
75match
rudehealthconsulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
Rude Health Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
75match
amgaconsulting.org
AMGA Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
75match
amgaconsulting.net
AMGA Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
75match
amsa-consulting.ceo
AMSA Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
74match
febeconsulting.com
Home | Febe Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
74match
channel3consulting.co.uk 🇬🇧
Channel 3 Consulting
2 shared topicshealthcare-industry
74match
ariotcon.com
Ariot Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
74match
rnlinkconsult.com
RN Link Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
73match
3pathsconsulting.net
3 Paths Consulting
2 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.