Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softregent.com

Home - Softregent Technologies · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
ksxtec.com
KSX Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
ksxtech.com
KSX Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
softwaregaze.com
Home - Software Gaze
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
clipboat.com
Clipboat Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
dnaktechnologies.com
DNAK Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
doji-tech.com
Doji Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
labscale.com
LabScale Technologies, Inc.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
labscaleqa.com
LabScale Technologies, Inc.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
artisantechng.com
Artisan Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
robotea.com
Robotea technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
softwarekeystech.com
Home - softwarekeystech
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
softwaretechnologiesllc.com
Software Technologies LLC
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
pineapple.dev
Pineapple Technologies Inc
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
bflat.io
Bflat by 60East Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
softwarearray.com
Home - Software Array
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
softwareframe.com
Home - SoftwareFrame
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
softogon.com
Home - softogon.com
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
growildtech.com
Growild Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.