Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softplanetit.com

SoftPlanet Technologies · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
soilsoft.ai
SoilSoft Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
fe-technologies.com
FE Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
dotspottech.com
DotSpot Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
ngstechnologies.com
NGS Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
ngmtechnologies.com
NGM Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
cmzrtechnologies.com
CMZR Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
fawntechnologies.com
Fawn Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
intagrit.com
IntaGrit Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
alzio.tech
Alzio Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
codecresttechs.com
CodeCrest Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
cofemtech.com
Cofem Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
nextzy.com
NEXTZY TECHNOLOGIES
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
sorgetechnologies.com
Sorge Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
elvin-technologies.co.uk 🇬🇧
Elvin Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
softtrill.com
Softtrill Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
solnextechnologies.com
Solnex Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
sorrisotech.com
Sorriso Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
beebyte.tech
BeeByte Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.