Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softdrawers.com

Soft Drawers – Game Dev and Illustration · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
kubsart.com
Anna Kubart – 2D Game Artist and Illustrator
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
ryanmus.com
Ryan Mus – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
pingslair.com
Pings Lair – Game Dev Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
rylonstudio.com
Rylon Studio – Game Dev
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
drakkardev.com
Drakkar Dev – Game Developers
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
gregmcleod.com
Greg McLeod – Game/Software Dev and Musician
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
maxbennett.dev
Max Bennett – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
cluttercloudgames.com
ClutterCloud Games – game developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
bellumgames.net
BELLUM GAMES – Game development and publishing
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
mateigiurgiu.com
Matei Giurgiu – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
mathewpalumbo.com
Mathew Palumbo – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
robertpercival.com
Robert Percival – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
rohogames.com
Rob Howard – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
bochengyao.com
Bocheng Yao – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
nexagonstudio.com
NEXAGON Studio – Game Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
bnguyenportfolio.com
Bryan Nguyen – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
boiethomsen.com
BOIE THOMSEN – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
phosdigital.com
PHOSDIGITAL.COM – game development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.