Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softburger.de

assistent software UG · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
q5-software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
q5software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
kpro-software.com
KPro Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
parsec-software.de 🇩🇪
[pc] software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
software-beycodent.de 🇩🇪
Beycodent Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
sourcery.de 🇩🇪
Sourcery Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
peak-software.de 🇩🇪
Peak Software UG
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
retech-software.de 🇩🇪
retech software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
rcmosoftware.de 🇩🇪
R.C.M.O. Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
schmailzl-software.de 🇩🇪
Schmailzl Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
software-und-buecher.de 🇩🇪
Software und Bücher
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
sevenbytesoftware.de 🇩🇪
Seven Byte Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
software-harz.de 🇩🇪
Software Harz
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
qbdata.de 🇩🇪
Quabach | Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
thelanfear.com
AIM Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
onesoftware.de 🇩🇪
ONE - Software & ideas
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
stripf-software.de 🇩🇪
Stripf Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
seserver.de 🇩🇪
Secret Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.