Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to softbend.com

@vita Software der softbend PartG · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
pecher-software.de 🇩🇪
Pecher Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
plaetzer-software.de 🇩🇪
Plätzer Software | PCB
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
thelanfear.com
AIM Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
scthsoftware.de 🇩🇪
SCTH Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
gsd-software.com
GSD Software | GSD Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
rogler-software.com
Rogler Software | Rogler Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
pfeiffersoftware.de 🇩🇪
Pfeiffer Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
marxmeier.com
Marxmeier Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
mathos-software.org
mathos software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
q5software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
q5-software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
sandpapersoftware.de 🇩🇪
Sandpaper Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
openfestmap.de 🇩🇪
Daniel Manger Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
ruja-software.de 🇩🇪
RuJa Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
anima.software
Anima Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
randteam.de 🇩🇪
R&D-Team - Software Development
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
skyscrapersoftware.de 🇩🇪
Skyscraper Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
ankr.software
ANKR Software GmbH & Co. KG
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.