Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to soft-academia.com

Soft-ACADEMIA · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
academia-os.org
AcademiaOS
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
soft-to-you.com
Soft-to-you
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
softwaretestingguru.com
V2soft-design
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
softwaresguru.com
V2soft-design
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softtechbazzar.com
soft-tech Bazaar
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softx.app
SOFTX
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
domandata.net
Domandata | Academic Survey Software for Survey Research
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
bibforge.org
BibForge — Academic BibTeX Library Manager
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
armsoft.com
Armsoft
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
djasoft.com
djasoft
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
ron-soft.com
Ronsoft
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softiyx.com
Softiyx
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softwareespresso.com
CMD Software Espresso
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softpromixer.com
softpro
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
softzit.com
Softzit
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
cnidarity.com
Cnidarity | Research Data Management Software for Academic Teams
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
abstractwiz.com
Abstract management software for academic conferences - AbstractWiz
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
acrosoft.tech
Acrosoft
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.