Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sofraonthetable.com

Sofra on the table · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
thetablearchitect.com
The TABLE Architect
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
kthengono.com
Kelvin Thengono
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
thekalascape.com
Home - The Kalascape
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
thelumous.com
Sculptural Table Lamps & Artistic Lighting | TheLumous Designer Lamps
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
kurieto.com
Kuriēto Tableware | Handcrafted Japanese Tableware
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
3sparkdesign.com
3 Spark Design - Zinc Brass and Copper Tables and Bar Tops
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
themadcraftduckie.com
Home - The Mad Craft Duckie Sudio
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
therugest.com
The Rug Est.
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
thesublimeproject.com
Project - The Sublime Project
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
sofrehstudio.com
Sofreh Studio
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
thelineconcept.com
The Line Concept
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
thepillowcollection.com
Designer Throw Pillows Made In The USA By The Pillow Collection
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
thesaltylifeco.com
The Salty Life Co.
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
theofficedesigner.com
Home - The Office Designer.com
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
theminimonoproject.com
The MiNiMONO Project - SUSTAINABLE FURNITURE DESIGN – theminimonoproject
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
themarblis.com
MARBLIS - Architectural Surfaces Mineralized by the Sea
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
theonedesignstudio.com
The One Design Studio | Furniture Solutions
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
bluefaystudio.com
Bluefae Studio
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.