Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sofiaabbas.com

Sofia Abbas – Writer, scholar, aspiring murder mystery party host · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
alanmoodymystery.com
Alan Moody – Alan Moody murder mystery books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
kyleethewriter.com
Kylee the writer – Young Adult Mystery Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
kyliecatena.com
Kylie Catena – Writer, Editor, Student
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
gtkarber.com
G. T. Karber, Hollywood mystery writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
rosariagiorgi.com
Rosaria Giorgi | Mystery Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
mauralammers.com
Maura Lammers – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
adrickbrock.com
Adrick Brock – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
ktcarlisle.com
Murder Mystery Indie Author | K.T. Carlisle
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
felicityfeiner.com
Felicity Feiner – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
rociocarranza.com
Rocio Carranza – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
albertdavenport.com
Albert Davenport – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
robynryle.com
Robyn Ryle Author – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
rlhendie.com
Rachel L. Henderson – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
ariketzal.com
Ari Ketzal – fiction writer, essayist
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
romosreadingroom.com
K.L. Romo – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
dlanesharp.com
D. Lane Sharp – writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
thepoisonedmartini.com
The Poisoned Martini – For Mysteries & More!
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
andrewblossom.com
Andrew Blossom – Writer, editor, publisher, cat mother.
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.