Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to soffid.com

Home - soffid · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
softseq.com
Home - SoftSeq
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
77match
softcages.com
Home - Softcage
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
76match
solielcom.com
Home - Soliel
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
76match
tecsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - %
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
76match
technologysolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - %
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
75match
somer-tech.com
Home - SomerTech
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
sqntech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - SQNTech
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
roguesecops.com
Home -
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
netvistatechnologies.com
Home -
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
a2n.net
Home - A2N
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
maxtonsystems.com
Home -
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
thepracticalsecurityexpert.com
Home -
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
alaskashredders.com
Home - VRC
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
alexandriadepot.net
Home - VRC
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
3ndd.com
Home - VRC
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
advancedrecords.com
Home - VRC
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
docuredi.com
Home - VRC
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
docusafe.com
Home - VRC
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.