Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sofawolf.com

Sofawolf Press Inc · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
bfgpress.com
BFG PRESS - Home
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
berestapress.com
Beresta Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
agdrpress.com
AGdR Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
fauvepress.com
Fauve Press | Independent Publisher
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
bewilderpress.com
BEWILDER PRESS
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
masispress.com
The Masis Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
newritualpress.com
New Ritual Press - New Ritual Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
sociologypress.com
Sociology Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
arsenalpulp.com
Arsenal Pulp Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
bluetreepress.com
Home - Blue Tree Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
bluefoxpress.com
BlueFox Press - Book Publishing Company
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
softreturnpress.com
Soft Return Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
kukishinhanbo.com
Home - Kihon Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
inspiremepress.com
Home - Inspire Me Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
beltpublishing.com
American Express
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
birkbecklawpress.com
Birkbeck Law Press - Book Series - Routledge & CRC Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
benjamincampbellbooks.com
Teutoburg Forest Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
aipress.info
Anthology Inspired Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.