Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to socialtime.de

Daten­banken und Anwendungs­entwicklung · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
reisevotum.de 🇩🇪
Daten­banken und Anwendungs­entwicklung
2 shared topicsdatabases
100match
socialbay.de 🇩🇪
Daten­banken und Anwendungs­entwicklung
2 shared topicsdatabases
100match
soli-pass.de 🇩🇪
Daten­banken und Anwendungs­entwicklung
2 shared topicsdatabases
100match
social-times.de 🇩🇪
Daten­banken und Anwendungs­entwicklung
2 shared topicsdatabases
100match
solipass.de 🇩🇪
Daten­banken und Anwendungs­entwicklung
2 shared topicsdatabases
72match
ioquest.com
Datenbanken und Softwareentwicklung - IOQuest Hamburg
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
pm-cloud.de 🇩🇪
WaWiGa
2 shared topicsdatabases
62match
probeunterricht-info.de 🇩🇪
Svarovsky - Internet - Datenbank - Programmierung
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
rechtplus.de 🇩🇪
Svarovsky - Internet - Datenbank - Programmierung
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
projekt-db.de 🇩🇪
Projekte Projekte Projekte
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
projekte-db.de 🇩🇪
Projekte Projekte Projekte
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
sitecoreschubla.de 🇩🇪
Sitecore Schublade
2 shared topicsweb-development
45match
reactivedata.de 🇩🇪
ReactiveData - Softwareentwicklung
2 shared topicsweb-development
44match
progster.de 🇩🇪
Progster.de - WEB-Apps - Machinelles Lernen - Datenbankanwendungen
2 shared topicsdatabases
41match
smileback.de 🇩🇪
Webentwicklung
1 shared topicsweb-development
40match
arnt-jonas.com
Projekt Beschreibung
2 shared topicsweb-development
40match
software-hess.de 🇩🇪
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
40match
petergasser.com
Web- und App Entwicklung
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.