Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to smsummers.com

Sally Maria Summers – Author's Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
luannebennett.com
LUANNE BENNETT – Author's Site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
79match
jwdbooks.com
John Daniel Books – Author's website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
brunomartinssoares.com
BRUNO MARTINS SOARES – AUTHOR'S PAGE
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
juliaboon.com
Julia Boon – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
gabrielagonzales.com
Gabriela Gonzales – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
louiseaustin.com
Louise Austin – Children's Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
ashlenbrown.com
Ashlen Brown – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
corytoscano.com
Cory Toscano – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
jrludwig.com
J. R. Ludwig – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
reneebeyea.com
Renée Beyea – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
rebekahsimmers.com
Rebekah Simmers – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
angienordstromauthor.com
Angie Nordstrom – Angie's author website
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
singingmagpies.com
Michael Pattarozzi – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
juliawillow.com
Julia Willow – Children's Book Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
alariccabiling.net
ALARIC CABILING's OFFICIAL SITE – AUTHOR
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
louisemarburg.com
Louise Marburg – author website
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
the2beanscafe.com
Kasey Rogers – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
juniperwhiteauthor.com
Explore the Worlds of Juniper White – YA author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.