Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to smahdavi.com

Sadegh Mahdavi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
simolark.com
Yi He (何毅) - Homepage
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
andrewzhou.org
andrew zhou
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
mrdokumcu.com
Home - Mert Dokumcu
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
sidneyneil.dev
Sidney Neil — AI & Hardware Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
juntaotan.com
Juntao's Homepage
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
adambreuer.com
Adam Breuer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
abhilash-jindal.com
Abhilash Jindal | Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Delhi
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
aabhashdhakal.com
Aabhash Dhakal
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
terrisastra.com
TerrisAstra
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ataturkdogan.com
Ata Türkdoğan | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
juliekristen.com
Julie Kristen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
sigmajahan.com
Sigma Jahan | ΣJ
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
kadenritzer.com
Kaden Ritzer | ECE Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
oviamuthu.com
Ovia Muthu - Computer Engineering Student at Purdue
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
aburomoh.com
Mohannad Abu-Romoh
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jtlicardo.com
Josip Tomo Licardo
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
thchar.com
Theo Charalambous
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
calvinhuang.me
Calvin Huang
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.