Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sm-ar.com

SM Architektur & Projektmanagement · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
9grad.net
9grad architektur
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
dobra-architektura.com
Architekt / projektant
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
senior-projekt.de 🇩🇪
Senior Projekt Schulzenhof GmbH - Architekt Herbert Knopf
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
coarchitektur.com
C/O Architektur AG - Architekten Zürich
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
thomas-stechl.de 🇩🇪
Thomas Stechl Architektur
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
grazag.com
graz architekten ag
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
angelis-architektur.com
Reinhard Angelis Architektur
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
schreinerei-sepp.de 🇩🇪
Architekturbüro Arne Deck
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
planplus-gmbh.de 🇩🇪
planplus gmbh architekturbüro . projektplanung . stadtplanung . wertermittlung
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
projekte-planer.de 🇩🇪
Architekt Michael Trawny
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
bmh-architekten.com
Home 1 - bmh Architekten
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
studiobauko.de 🇩🇪
studio bauko architekten
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
steinplus-architekten.de 🇩🇪
STEIN Architekten Köln - Startseite
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
steinplusarchitektur.de 🇩🇪
STEIN Architekten Köln - Startseite
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
seiz-weber.de 🇩🇪
Home | Seiz & Weber Architekten
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
studio-swa.de 🇩🇪
SCHWAN WEBER ARCHITEKTUR | Architekturbüro aus Aachen
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
studioweisz.de 🇩🇪
Projekte
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
schweikert-schilling.de 🇩🇪
Schweikert Schilling - Architektur und Gestaltung
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.