Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to skhot.com

Scott Purcell | UX Design Leader & Growth Strategist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ananthpai.com
Ananth Pai — Design Leader
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
ethaneismann.com
Ethan Eismann — Design Leader
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
estebangz.com
Esteban Gimenez Zapiola — Creative Director & Design Leader, Sydney
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
2em-creative.com
Soumya Nagesh :: Design Leader
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
andr3wcurran.com
Andrew Curran | Design Leader, Product Design, Content Design
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
artlesshand.com
Farzan Balkani — Design & Product Executive | Dubai
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
malwina.io
Malwina Fojcik - Senior Design Manager
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
andrewslifkin.com
Andrew Slifkin | Design Manager
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
paygekerman.com
Payge Kerman — Product & Design Executive
2 shared topicsdesign
65match
paulpriestman.com
PAUL PRIESTMAN – Design | Innovation | Leadership
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
charliegann.com
Charlie Gann Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
amykimmett.com
Amy Kimmett Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
designmeco.com
DesignMeCo
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
teresuk.com
Jamie Teresuk | Helping brands and products fulfill their design potential.
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
renatocampana.com
Renato Campana
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
kieranmineham.com
Kieran Mineham
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
pavelsamsonov.com
Pavel Samsonov
2 shared topicsdesign
61match
cheezywhiz.com
Michael Szabo - San Francisco, CA | about.me
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.