Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to skavras.com

Skavras ISV · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
redpine.dev
Red Pine Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
oxlun.com
OXLUN — software projects & services
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
aagentic.org
Aagentic
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
lorenzofiordiponti.com
Lorenzo Fiordiponti
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
2am.digital
2am.digital | Software built in stolen hours
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
jtsoftware.com
JT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
correiavirtus.com
Correia Virtus — Independent Software Studio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mrvsoftware.com
Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
palekilomieistudios.com
Palekilomiei Studios
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
brynlewis.com
Backbeach Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bttsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
BTT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
ascentsoftwares.co.in 🇮🇳
Welcome To Ascent Softwares
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bysmd.com
SMD SOFTWARE
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bsitindia.com
bS !t Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
efdsoftware.com
EFD Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
tgesoft.com
TGE Software Home Page
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
jdrsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
JDR Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
jump-soft.com
JumpSoft
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.