Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to skanfix.com

Homepage | Skanfix · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
jusconnec.com
Homepage | Connec
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
ableropes.com
Homepage | Able Ropes
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
jwpcorp.com
Homepage - JWP
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
bwicltd.com
Homepage - BWIC
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
71match
adep.mn
Homepage - Adep
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
hggroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Homepage | Huws Gray Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
adstonconstruction.com
Homepage - Adston
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
acg-builds.com
Homepage - acgbuilds
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
acgbuilds.com
Homepage - acgbuilds
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
terrarockindustries.com
Homepage - TerraRock
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
storagesystemsglos.co.uk 🇬🇧
Homepage | Complete Design & Build
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
buildezy.app
Buildezy Homepage
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
bulgartrade.com
Homepage - Bulgar Trade
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
testindobeton.com
Homepage - Testindobeton
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
signage-direct.com
Homepage - Signage Direct
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
ableestimating.com
Homepage - ABLE Estimating
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
corradoconstruction.com
Homepage | Corrado Construction Company
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
builtenvironmentglobal.com
Homepage - The Built Economy
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.