Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sjlearningdesign.com

Sarah Jamieson Learning Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
designlearningobjects.com
Design Learning Objects
1 shared topicsonline-education
71match
angwong.com
Angela Wong — Learning Designer
1 shared topicsonline-education
71match
bethypierre.com
Bethy Pierre | Learning Design Expert
1 shared topicsonline-education
70match
anjionlearning.com
ANJION LEARNING
1 shared topicsonline-education
70match
janebransonlearning.co.uk 🇬🇧
Jane Branson Learning
1 shared topicsonline-education
70match
sinembasaran.com
Sinem Başaran – Digital Learning Designer
1 shared topicsonline-education
70match
immersionlearning.co.uk 🇬🇧
Immersion Learning
1 shared topicsonline-education
69match
ilovet1d.com
T1D Learning Hub
1 shared topicsonline-education
69match
thelearninghub.org.uk 🇬🇧
The Learning Hub
1 shared topicsonline-education
69match
acornlearning.info
Acorn Learning Website
1 shared topicsonline-education
69match
andy-campbell-portfolio.com
Andy Campbell | Learning Systems Design
1 shared topicsonline-education
69match
4klearning.ie 🇮🇪
4K Learning
1 shared topicsonline-education
68match
mannalearningco.com
Manna Learning Co
1 shared topicsonline-education
68match
awslearning.org
AWS Learning
1 shared topicsonline-education
68match
biclearn.com
Learning Lab
1 shared topicsonline-education
68match
maktabza.com
Maktabza.com – Learning deen
1 shared topicsonline-education
68match
peerprc.com
Peer Learning Inc.
1 shared topicsonline-education
68match
destinlearning.com
Destin Learning Home- New
1 shared topicsonline-education

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.