similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to sjcaples.com

Sawyer — Bio Sites · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

100topbooksites.com

100 Top Book Sites

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

100 Top Book Sites

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

amystaufferwrites.com

Amy Stauffer — A Quiet Saga

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

3reads — Share Your Reading Identity

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Nalnda — Buy. Read. Resell.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

KiahAviyu.com — Bookstore

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bethalvarado.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Textologic — One Sentence. The Whole Book.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annalautenschlaeger.com

Anna Lautenschlaeger — Entrepreneur, Author, Speaker

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

kidsbooksite.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

patesteeledevsite1.com

Beyond Biocentrism — Robert Lanza

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Remime — being echoed.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ifyoulookedatme.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sirbrianspease.com

@lgbt_theboyofhearts Lnk.Bio · link in bio

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

3pointmentor.com

3PointMentor — Book Wisdom in 3 Points

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ANDRUA — Books by Susan Andrua Wilson

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.