Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sjbevins.com

Samuel Bevins | Researcher · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
tfx-lab.com
Lab | Research & Teaching at UMD
2 shared topicsphysics
67match
acceleratorresearch.org
Accelerator Research Lab
2 shared topicsphysics
67match
ampresearch.com
Home | AMP Research Inc.
2 shared topicsphysics
67match
research-unpacked.com
Research Unpacked
2 shared topicsphysics
67match
sirenaverhoye.com
Sirena Verhoye — Independent Researcher
2 shared topicsphysics
66match
thearcresearch.com
ARC – Apex Research Centre
2 shared topicsscience
66match
ihimani.com
Himani Saraswat – Material Science Researcher
2 shared topicsscience
66match
ewaldkrainz.com
ARI - Aether Research Institute
2 shared topicsphysics
66match
pazsoldan.com
Carlos Paz-Soldan's Research Page
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
anikettekawade.com
Aniket Tekawade – Researcher, Teacher, Problem Solver
2 shared topicsscience
65match
researchandideas.com
Research and Ideas - Researchandideas
2 shared topicsscience
65match
glowinggoo.com
Glowing Goo Research - XenoMorphic Area
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
etn-b.com
Ethan Beddard - Physics Student & Applied Photonics Researcher
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
alchemicalscience.org
Alchemical Science – Open Source Research
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
chaosense.com
Research-grade Radiant Sensors | Chaosense
2 shared topicsscience
65match
ijrr.com
International Journal of Radiation Research -
2 shared topicsscience
64match
albertcheung.net
Likai (Albert) Zhang - Visiting Undergraduate Researcher at UC Irvine
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
n2quantumai.com
N2QuantumAI — Futuristic Science & Photonics Research
2 shared topicsphysics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.