Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sitestyler.de

Portfolio — Serhat KARAKOC · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
marius-olbrich.com
Marius Olbrich — Portfolio 2026
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
rivancode.dev
Ivan | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
richter-softwaresysteme.de 🇩🇪
Portfolio-Webseite
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
phillipconrad.de 🇩🇪
Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
markusstuefer.com
Markus Stuefer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
rohrpasser.de 🇩🇪
Kai Rohrpasser | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
maurice-klein.com
Maurice Klein – Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
pencilarts.de 🇩🇪
Duttke.De • Portfolio of Jens Duttke
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
fe-commerce.com
Siam IT – Freelancer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
maxbudziat.com
Max Budziat - Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
pikcode.de 🇩🇪
Mikayil - Full-Stack Developer | Portfolio and Blog
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
seo-essen.de 🇩🇪
SEO-Tool Developer: Daniel Abromeit {Portfolio}
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
seo-koeln.de 🇩🇪
SEO-Tool Developer: Daniel Abromeit {Portfolio}
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
peterbockowski.com
Peter Bockowski — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
faebits.com
FaeBits — The Realm
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
ioannisliakos.com
Ioannis Liakos — Senior Full-Stack Entwickler · Freiberuflich
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
aifach.org
aifach — Studio für Web und Software, Zürich
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
4life-marketing.com
4LIFE — Schweizer Digitalagentur · Websites, E-Commerce & KI
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.