similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to sisdeans.com

Sis Deans | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧

Carolyn Ellis | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anniequinnwrites.com

Annie Quinn | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

denicevickers.com

Denice Vickers | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aneliaschutte.com

Anelia Schutte | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

angelalgold.com

Angela L Gold | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kim Liggett | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Patti Gully | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ettenigsayambooks.com

Ettenig Sayam | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

denikacarothersebook.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bevbeckauthor.com

bevbackauthor | author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

khloeolivera.com

Khloe Olivera | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

B Manjula Rao | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

chelseabanning.com

Chelsea Banning | author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

esthersanniauthor.com

Esther L Sanni | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

paul-schueller.com

Home | Author Paul Schueller

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andreayarbough.com

Andrea Yarbough | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.