Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sinfulfolk.com

Sinful Folk | Ned Hayes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
painfulstories.com
PAINFUL STORIES
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
sinfulobsessionsco.com
Sinful Obsessions Book Co.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
thelittleladyagency.co.uk 🇬🇧
Hester Browne | Home | New York Times bestselling author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
juellhayz.com
Juell Hayz
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
lorrainebartlett.com
Author Lorraine Bartlett | New York Times Bestselling Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
caitlynmayes.com
Caitlyn Mayes
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
annemitchellwriting.com
Anne Mitchell Writing | NEVER GIVE UP HOPE
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
cpdemaris.com
Author | novelist
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
redheadedfemme.com
Red Headed Femme
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
tgmonahan.com
Home - TG Monahan
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
angryfolkstudio.com
AngryFolkStudio | Home of the Angryfolk Media Empire
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
craigfaustusbuck.com
Craig Faustus Buck | Noir Suspense Mystery Thriller Pulp
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
julesclark.com
Jules Clark | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
ozziecheekwriter.com
Ozzie Cheek | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
reavax.com
Home | Beautiful Stories
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
simonhaynes.com
Simon Haynes - Biography
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
caitlinrosefoleywriting.com
Caitlin Rose Foley - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
61match
bumpedhishead.com
Home | Bumped His Head Book
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.