Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sinex.dev

Matthew Sinex - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
adarshyadav.dev
Adarsh Yadav - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ethanowens.dev
Ethan Owens - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
simuratli.com
Eljan Simuratli - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
axlc.dev
Axl Cuyugan | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
imanalsamman.com
Iman AlSamman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
akshaymondal.com
Akshay Mondal - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
nasim.dev
Nasim Ali | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
majedalshehri.com
Majed Alshehri - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
narinsun.com
NRS | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
narinrico.com
NRS | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
bibakroy.com
Bibak Roy - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
deneejones.com
Denee Jones - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
nacefotay.com
Nacef Otay | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewmoses.dev
AM - Software Engineer | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
argenh.dev
Arge Niño - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
imayush.dev
Ayush Kumar | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
pebruwantoro.com
Doni Pebruwantoro - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.