Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonschoof.com

Simon Schoof - Simon Schoof · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
simoncw.com
Simon says | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simonveal.com
Simon Veal
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simondiehm.com
Simon Diehm
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonharrer.com
Simon Harrer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonrenger.com
Simon Renger
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonpaonessa.com
Simon M. Paonessa
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simoncha.com
Simon Cha Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
simonkurbiel.com
SimonCodes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
simonkala.com
Šimon Kala
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
simon-leistikow.com
Freelance C++ Developer & Data Scientist | Simon Leistikow
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
simoryu.com
Simo Ryu | Not everything about Simo Ryu
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
simonkayar.com
Simon + Kayar – The world through my eyes..
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alanschwartzjr.com
Alan Schwartz Jr. | Resume
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
simonecarletti.com
Simone Carletti — Underwater programmer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
simo-simo.com
Simo | Notion
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
simsekselim.com
Selim Simsek
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
andrewjsimmons.com
Andrew Simmons
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
0reg.dev
Retr0's Register
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.