Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonrosset.com

Simon Rosset - Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
arielgoldring.dev
Ariel Goldring | Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
arseniiy.tech
Arseniiy Kapshtyk - Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
ethanmossdev.com
Ethan Moss - Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
a-mkemp.com
A-M Kemp Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ethanh-dev.com
Ethan Ho | Personal Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
alvinmatthew.com
Alvin Matthew | Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andy-vu.com
Andy Vu | Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
naspo.dev
Naspo Dev Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
69match
arshpreetsinghcse.com
Arshpreet Singh Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
akennedy.info
Aaron Kennedy's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
69match
amitmehta.dev
Amit Mehta Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
abuffseagull.dev
ABuffSeagull's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
natalieaponte.com
Natalie Aponte Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
tgreenidge.com
Portfolio - Tisha Greenidge
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
amir-aranibar.com
Backend Engineer Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
iliadobkin.com
Ilia Dobkin — portfolio.spec.ts
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
pdsystems.dev
Peter Deacon - Full-stack systems portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
simplyaam.com
SimplyAam - Mohammad Adeel | Portfolio & Learning Journal
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.