Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonkaeppeli.com

Simon Kaeppeli, PhD – Simon Kaeppeli, PhD · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
nabinkoirala.com
Nabin Koirala, PhD – Engineer, Neuroscientist
1 shared topicsscience
64match
simonlohse.com
Simon Lohse
1 shared topicsscience
64match
angeedoerr.com
Angee N. Doerr, PhD - Home
1 shared topicsscience
64match
simon-makin.com
Dr. Simon Makin – Science Journalist – Dr. Simon Makin – Science Journalist
1 shared topicsscience
64match
simonleewx.com
Atmospheric Dynamics @ St Andrews – Simon H. Lee, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences
1 shared topicsscience
64match
simonsisay.com
Simon Sisay
1 shared topicsscience
64match
pcklink.com
Chris Klink, PhD | Chris Klink, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
64match
simonscientific.com
Simon Scientific
1 shared topicsscience
64match
simon-brain.com
Simon Brain
1 shared topicsscience
63match
sisterdoctorsquared.com
Sister Doctor Squared – Two sisters, two PhDs, relentlessly curious about too many things…
1 shared topicsscience
63match
testolimited.com
Testolimited – Sciences
1 shared topicsscience
63match
simonkibota.com
SimonKibota – Data Science
1 shared topicsscience
63match
3mbed.com
3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research
1 shared topicsscience
63match
adeelrazi.org
Adeel Razi, PhD
1 shared topicsscience
63match
ikramulhasan.com
Md. Ikramul Hasan – PhD Student, University of Michigan
1 shared topicsscience
63match
researchagora.com
Research Agora – Better research, together.
1 shared topicsscience
63match
simulation-argument.com
The Simulation Argument
1 shared topicsscience
63match
naomiullian.com
Naomi Ullian – science writing, essays, photography
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.