Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonjs.com

Simon Scott – Researcher · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
anekaraj.com
Aneka Raj — Researcher & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
designresearchnotes.com
Design Research Notes
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
denisvlieghe.com
Denis Vlieghe – research works
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
paulinezaldonis.com
Pauline Zaldonis – Researcher and Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
keyoniscott.com
Keyoni Scott – Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
simplyyogastudios.com
Keyoni Scott – Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
simonmaidment.com
Simon Maidment: design & research
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
toyfoo.com
toyfoo - Interaction Designer & Researcher Thomas Laureyssens
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
traciekreiss.com
Tracie Kreiss: Product Designer and Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
ilduza.com
Ilduza Mammadova | UX Researcher & Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
designresearchservices.com
Design Research Services
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
chenxicui.com
Chenxi Cui | Design Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
dengninghe.com
Dengning Flora He | Product Designer & Researcher | Boston
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
ashlyncassity.com
Ashlyn Cassity | Senior UX Designer & Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
simonbromander.com
Simon Bromander
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
simonbraun.io
Home | Simon Braun
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
nairinasrallah.com
Nairi Nasrallah – Strategic Researcher & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
estudioa0.com
Estudio A0 – Architecture + Research
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.