Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonharms.com

Simon Harms | Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
aaronhsu.me
Aaron Hsu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
adamscottryals.com
A. Scott Ryals | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
andrigerber.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
andycraig.dev
Andy Craig | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
aswdq.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
lucasdriessens.com
Lucas Driessens | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
loukas.dev
Chat Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
atulparida.com
Atul Parida | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
sihoonsung.com
Sihoon Sung | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
aidanmcpheeters.com
Aidan McPheeters | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
acsresultsai.net
Alex Seisler | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
aheredia.info
Andy Heredia | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
adityabishtportfolio.org
Aditya Bisht | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
lukepastore.com
Luke Pastore | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
mujaxso.com
Mujahid Siyam | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
echo-paulus.com
Echo's Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
lukaszmalucha.com
Coding Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ahadchowdhury.com
Ahad Chowdhury | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.