Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonhalliday.com

Simon Halliday – Game Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
simonfruehauf.com
Simon Frühauf - Technical Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
kimbychu.com
Kim Wood - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
ilyafirsov.com
Ilya Firsov – Game Designer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
bidju.com
Yannick Berthier – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
igorhatakeyama.com
Igor Hatakeyama – Game Designer & Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
andrewstewartgames.com
Andrew Stewart – Game Designer –
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
chasemakesgames.com
Chase Jones | game designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
tevansgames.com
TOM EVANS – GAME DESIGNER & GAMEPLAY SCRIPTER
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
evagamedev.com
Evangelia Fahantidou – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
demosfotias.com
Demos Fotias – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
thalesrebelo.com
Thales Rebelo - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
theartofgamedesign.com
The Art Of Game Design – Schell Games
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
simonkv.com
SimonKv – Game Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
illwinter.com
Illwinter Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
paynecj.com
CJ Payne | Game Designer |
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
andreaortino.com
Andrea Ortino - Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
chaoticstupid.com
Chaotic Stupid – Game Design Wisdom
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.