Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simongt.com

Simon Turner | Blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
historianruby.com
History Miscellany | Blog
1 shared topicshistory
65match
simonbriercliffe.com
Simon Briercliffe
1 shared topicshistory
65match
simonbaatz.com
SIMON BAATZ - HOME
1 shared topicshistory
64match
historyweblog.com
History Moments Blog
1 shared topicshistory
64match
asorblog.org
Homepage - The ASOR Blog
1 shared topicshistory
63match
simonwenham.com
Simon Wenham - British Social History
1 shared topicshistory
63match
texhist.com
The Texas History Blog
1 shared topicshistory
63match
gbarner.com
geobarner | Thoughts and Information From an Old Guy
1 shared topicshistory
63match
holtecast.com
Holte Cast – blog
1 shared topicshistory
63match
simonharley.com
A Blog on the Ocean Wave – Witterings from a naval historian
1 shared topicshistory
63match
homer-ny.com
Home | Homer | NY One-Place-Study
1 shared topicshistory
63match
sidneyaster.com
SIDNEY ASTER | PROFESSOR SIDNEY ASTER
1 shared topicshistory
63match
anglicanhistory.net
Anglican History Blog
1 shared topicshistory
63match
histofreak.com
HistoFreak | Southeast Asian History Blog — Kingdoms, Colonialism & Culture |
1 shared topicshistory
63match
sinanbilgin.com
Blog
1 shared topicshistory
63match
abnormalcypodcast.com
TODD ROBBINS' ABNORMALCY PODCAST – Twisted true tales of bad things that happened during the good old days of the past.
1 shared topicshistory
63match
gaelhistory.com
Gael History | Scottish Living History | Inverness, Scotland, UK
1 shared topicshistory
63match
historiaster.com
Historiaster
1 shared topicshistory

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.