Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simongate.com

smgt · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
estebanl.com
estebanl
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
immichaelharris.com
Michael Harris
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
patriciagilberta.com
Patricia Gilberta
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
devcode7.com
DevCode7
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andhana.com
andhana - Web & Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
teteewansoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Tete Ewan Software Java Developers
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
andy-yates-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Andy Yates, Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
abigailthompson.net
Abigail Thompson
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
biankalasocka.com
Bianka Lasocka
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andrei-vasile.com
Andrei Vasile - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
devord.com
Devord • Custom Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
nadim-hossain.com
Nadim Hossain - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
designwitt.com
Jarred Witt
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
develiott.com
Eliott Wantz — Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
akramcodez.tech
Sk Akram
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
devcrank.com
DevCrank LLC.
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ancillarysoft.com
Ancillary Soft
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
repgateway.com
Polylogics | Software Development Specialists
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.