Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonfarmer.com

Simon Farmer | Operator-Technologist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
paulsapio.com
Paul Sapio — CIO & Technology Operator
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
71match
bi-technologies.net
BI-Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
pastellms.com
Ceyon Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
ascnd.cloud
Ascend Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
avrilchester.com
Influential Technologist
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
andmedtechnologies.com
Andmed Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
bidflow-technologies.com
BidFlow Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
kingpintechnology.com
Kingpin Technology
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
70match
tenztechnologies.com
Tenz Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
4wm.app
Technology | 4W Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
makeitpragmatic.com
Nui Technologies Ltd
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
cgatechnologies.org.uk 🇬🇧
CGA Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
sixjunetechnologies.com
Six June Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
drtechnology.co.uk 🇬🇧
DR Technology
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
picktech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pickering Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
bfs-technologies.com
BFS TECHNOLOGIES
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
gleez.ai
Gleez Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
gleeztech.com
Gleez Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.