Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simonewackershauser.de

Simone Wackershauser – Projekte, Vita, Kontakt · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
nepacodex.com
Kristin Brunner – Portfolio
2 shared topicsfine-art
65match
martinzeigner.com
martin zeigner – abstract arts
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
blum-art.com
BlumArt – contemporary art
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
ankefischer.org
anke fischer – artist / teaching artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
philipjaan.com
PHILIP JAAN – Art
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
philipjaanportfolio.com
PHILIP JAAN – Art
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
arthouse-project.com
Arthouse Project – All about art, people and creativity
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
coda-aesthetics.com
coda aesthetics – Kunst
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
rio-janeiro-design.com
andreas gleich – artist
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
dirkcomello.com
dirkcomello.com – Fine art
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
peterwarum.com
PETER WARUM/RUM – KONZEPT & KONKRETE KUNST
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
petrabalonier.com
p e t r a  b a l o n i e r – illustrator
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
siegfriedfelder.de 🇩🇪
Siegfried Felder – dekonstruiere, zerstöre, organisiere
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
marlenevoves.com
marlenevoves.com – Marlene Voves
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
gregorzoyzoyla.com
gregorzoyzoyla – radical modernism
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
rizzi-universe.com
James Rizzi – Pop Artist 
of a different kind
2 shared topicsfine-art
64match
rosestoll.de 🇩🇪
Rose Stoll – persönliche und kollektive Bilder
2 shared topicsfine-art
63match
fear-no-art.com
fear no art – Sylvia von Bernstorff
2 shared topicsfine-art

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.